151 real reviews analyzed for streaming, speed & torrenting – Trustpilot, Google Play, App Store & Chrome Web Store
Head-to-head comparison

CyberGhost vs Windscribe

Windscribe's real advantage is a genuine free tier – 10GB/month, enough to actually test unblocking and speed before paying anything. CyberGhost has no free plan at all, though its paid streaming infrastructure is more heavily documented.

Side-by-side

Head-to-head comparisons, with our own measurements where we have them.

FactorCyberGhostWindscribe
Streaming-optimized serversYes, but count not publishedNo dedicated label – general unblocking, weaker Netflix reputation than the other four
P2P/torrenting serversYes – P2P-optimized servers (features page)P2P allowed on paid plans, decent reputation for torrenting
Speed protocolWireGuard, OpenVPN, IKEv2WireGuard (via config generator), solid but free-tier servers can be congested
Price (best long-term plan)$2.19/mo (26-mo plan, billed $56.94 upfront) (intro rate)Budget Pro plan, roughly $1.89–$9/mo depending on term
Simultaneous devices7Unlimited (paid) / 10 devices (free)
Free plan✗ No✓ Yes – 10GB/month, genuinely usable

Where CyberGhost wins

CyberGhost's streaming infrastructure – 10-Gbps hardware, a named 40+ platform list – is more heavily documented and, by reputation, more consistent for Netflix specifically than Windscribe's general-purpose network.

Where Windscribe has the edge

Windscribe is the only one of the five with an actual free tier generous enough to test real streaming and torrenting performance before paying – a genuine advantage if you want proof before committing, even though its Netflix unblocking reputation trails the other four.

✓ Bottom line

Choose CyberGhost for more consistently documented streaming infrastructure. Choose Windscribe if you want to test real unblocking and speed on a free plan first, before paying for anything.

Measured head-to-head: CyberGhost vs Windscribe

Our own captures for CyberGhost and Windscribe, side by side, with every gap and every limit.

MeasuredCyberGhostWindscribe
Baseline download (VPN off)295 Mbps295 Mbps
Nearest Europe: serverStrasbourgParis Jardin (WireGuard 443)
Nearest Europe: download194 Mbps (66%)222 Mbps (75%)
Nearest Europe: upload157 Mbps178 Mbps
Nearest Europe: ping42 ms44 ms
Long-distance US: download210 Mbps (71%)203 Mbps (69%)
Long-distance US: ping126 ms108 ms
DNS leak test captured captured
WebRTC leak test captured captured
BBC iPlayer captured captured
Netflixnot capturednot captured

Takeaway: on the Europe route CyberGhost kept 66% of its baseline against 75% for Windscribe (a gap of 9 points); on the US route 71% against 69%. The gap is large enough to be worth noting, though it is still one run per route.

Same line and machine with a fresh baseline for each VPN. Server country and protocol can differ; one run per route.

All CyberGhost captures →

Questions people ask

Short answers, based on our own captures and the data on this site.

Which is faster, CyberGhost or Windscribe?

On the nearest-European route CyberGhost delivered 194 Mbps against Windscribe's 222 Mbps (66% vs 75% of each baseline); on the US route 210 vs 203 Mbps. One run each, so treat small gaps as noise.

Is CyberGhost or Windscribe better for streaming?

We captured CyberGhost playing BBC iPlayer. For Windscribe we captured BBC iPlayer. Missing results mean not captured, not failed.

Were both tested under the same conditions?

Same line and machine with a fresh baseline for each, but the server country and protocol can differ; the table lists them.

Where can I see the raw captures?

The screenshots and recordings for CyberGhost are on its tests pages. We publish captures only for the VPN each site is about.